well are you saying that people take a scripture and come up with biased arguments for their beliefs. I have broken down your sentence to make more sense of it. It looks like this: The basic nature of theological attacks, made up of specific details (properties) of arbitrary (personal prejudices or non-absolute) characteristics (a distinguishing feature or quality) of some historical linguistic detail. I am trying to understand not to sure though.
Oh it definitely matters. I mean how are we supposed to have theological diatribes without being able to rely on the specific properties of arbitrary characteristics of some historical lingustic detail? And without theological diatribes how am I supposed to make myself sound more intelligent, and therefore raise my status above, the mere plebeians of the world?
well are you saying that people take a scripture and come up with biased arguments for their beliefs. I have broken down your sentence to make more sense of it. It looks like this: The basic nature of theological attacks, made up of specific details (properties) of arbitrary (personal prejudices or non-absolute) characteristics (a distinguishing feature or quality) of some historical linguistic detail. I am trying to understand not to sure though.
ReplyDeletePeace Brendan
The
ReplyDeleteidea
is
that
it
doesn't
make
sense.
Oh it definitely matters. I mean how are we supposed to have theological diatribes without being able to rely on the specific properties of arbitrary characteristics of some historical lingustic detail? And without theological diatribes how am I supposed to make myself sound more intelligent, and therefore raise my status above, the mere plebeians of the world?
ReplyDeleteSmollygoster.
ReplyDeleteI resent that you mooncalf.
ReplyDeleteWhich just makes you a milksop.
ReplyDelete...and that's where most theological arguments lead...to basic name calling. ha ha! thanks for making my day!
ReplyDelete